Half in π Monthly ranking, the other half in π Fundamental. Combined live tracking since October 12, 2026, against the S&P 500, fees included.
β How this method works
How it works. Half of the money goes into π Monthly ranking and the other half into π Fundamental, each following the rule of its own tab. Once a year, the two halves can be reset to 50/50. The idea. The two methods don't have their good and bad years at the same time (in 2022, π held up while π fell; in 2018-2020, rather the opposite): combining them cushions the drops. Weak point. You have to follow both lists (10 stocks + around thirty). Over 2011-2025 the mix roughly matches the S&P 500: its main benefit is a smoother ride, not higher returns. See its historical result in the Comparator β
βΉοΈThis page is for information only and is not investment advice. It combines two fixed rules applied to public data. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
50/50 (live tracking)
β
S&P 500, same period
β
Difference
β
Tracked since
β
π + π 50/50S&P 500
Combined tracking starts once both methods have at least two days of live tracking in common.
This monthβs allocation
π Monthly ranking β 50%
Rank
Ticker
12-month gain
Weight
Amount
π Fundamental β 50%
Ticker
Company
Sector
Weight
Amount
Loadingβ¦
How to use this allocation
Each half follows the rule of its own tab: for π, stocks are kept as long as they stay in the top 10, without rebalancing; for π, every position is reset to an equal share each month.
Once a year (for example in January), the two halves can be reset to 50/50. In our study, this yearly rebalancing slightly improved the result (1,056 β¬ vs 976 β¬ since 2011).
A stock that appears in both lists gets both weights: it weighs more in the portfolio.
Many positions: 10 + around thirty stocks. To keep costs reasonable you need a large enough amount (about 500 β¬ minimum per position).
What the audited historical study says (100 β¬ invested in early 2011)
π alone
π alone
π + π 50/50
S&P 500 UCITS ETF
Sold at the end of 2025
507 β¬
687 β¬
596 β¬
682 β¬
Sold on 09/30/2026
945 β¬
775 β¬
859 β¬
774 β¬
Worst drop
β39.0%
β28.4%
β24.9%
β22.7%
5-year investments that beat the ETF
29%
77%
32%
β
Key takeaway: audited figures (companies that disappeared included, all costs, Belgian tax on dividends, real UCITS ETF). The mix has drops close to the ETF's, smaller than either method alone. Without 2026, an exceptional year for π, it does slightly worse than the ETF (12.7%/yr vs 13.7%). Only live tracking will tell how it behaves in the future. See the full audit β
Data combined automatically from the live tracking of the π Monthly ranking and π Fundamental tabs. Provided for educational and information purposes only: not investment advice. All investing involves a risk of capital loss.